Morgan Stanley
India | Sunday, 12 October 2008
Companies
All IBTimes

New York Times expands board to end proxy fight

By Kenneth Li And Robert Macmillan
Font Scale:
Posted 18 March 2008 @ 09:05 am GMT

New York Times Co said on Monday that it will add two seats to its board of directors and give them to a group of dissident investors to avert a proxy battle.

Taxis pass The New York Times building on Tuesday, March 18, 2008
Taxis pass The New York Times building on Tuesday, March 18, 2008. New York Times Co said on Monday that it will add two seats to its board of directors and give them to a group of dissident investors to avert a proxy battle. (Photo: AP)

Warning: include(/home/ibtimes.com/in/banner/htm/article_rectangle4.htm) [function.include]: failed to open stream: No such file or directory in /home/ibtimes.com/in/banner/banner.php on line 8

Warning: include() [function.include]: Failed opening '/home/ibtimes.com/in/banner/htm/article_rectangle4.htm' for inclusion (include_path='.:/usr/local/PEAR') in /home/ibtimes.com/in/banner/banner.php on line 8

The Times, under a deal with hedge fund Harbinger Capital Partners and investment firm Firebrand Partners, will raise the number of board seats to 15 from 13.

Harbinger and Firebrand have spent more than $500 million to amass a 19 percent stake in the Times since late December, making them the company's largest public shareholder.

They had proposed four nominees to the board and threatened to take their slate directly to shareholders at the company's annual meeting on April 22, creating the possibility that all four could get elected.

"Our nominees look forward to working with the other directors and management to build and deliver value for all shareholders," Harbinger Senior Managing Director Philip Falcone said in a statement.

The new slate will include Firebrand founder Scott Galloway and James Kohlberg, chairman of private equity company Kohlberg & Co. They were two of the four nominees that Harbinger had originally proposed.

The Times agreed to the dissident group's nominees to fend off a time-consuming and costly proxy fight, according to sources familiar with the matter.

"There's always real benefit to not taking it to the kind of death match that is the annual meeting," said one of the sources.

It is not clear what power the nominees would have because the Times is majority-controlled by the Ochs-Sulzberger family.

But the agreement signals the Times is not immune to outside influence despite a dual-class share structure designed to safeguard the integrity and longevity of its core property, The New York Times newspaper.

IBTimes RSS
E-Newsletters : Enter your Email for Fast News & Opinions
advertisement
Top Stories on Industries
advertisement