China's reform anniversary stirs political debate

• IBTimes RSS
• Print
• E-Mail
• digg
• Del.icio.us

The demands for loosening the Communist Party's grip have appeared in books, press commentaries and even official meetings ahead of the annual session of the Party-controlled parliament, which opens on Wednesday.

Forums discussing democratic reform, media freedom and other sensitive demands have attracted many dozens of citizens in Beijing and hundreds in Guangzhou, capital of Guangdong province.

"The discussion is certainly becoming livelier, but we have to see if this is going to be followed by substantial action," said Du Guang, a 79-year-old researcher at the Central Party School, an elite think-tank, who recently spoke at one such meeting in a crowded Beijing teahouse.

"That will depend not just on the central leadership's attitude but also on how strong the calls are from society."

China's leaders have shown no appetite for radical change that would challenge one-party rule, and with Beijing preparing for its showcase Olympic Games in August, they will be especially wary of unrest, likely locking away or isolating many dissidents.

But the Party Central Committee said after a meeting last week that some political reform was needed to cure misgovernance and social strains. And the national parliament is set to unify dozens of government ministries into several "super-ministries" and to promise parliament delegates a stronger say in policy.

Democracy advocates said they hope the international spotlight on the Games, and then the December anniversary of the 1978 meeting celebrated as launching Deng Xiaoping's market reforms, will open room for even bolder demands.

"These voices (for political change) have never entirely stopped, but since early this year they have grown markedly stronger. They've been waiting for an opening," said Liu Suli, owner of the All Sages bookstore in Beijing.

On Sunday, the cafe in his store hosted a forum on freedom of the press crowded with dozens of students and journalists, many criticizing censorship.

• 1
• 2
• 3